<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Personal Responsibility, Democrats, Republicans, JFK, Schwarzenegger and Cell Phones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billarends.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/personal-responsibility-democrats-republicans-jfk-schwarzenegger-and-cell-phones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billarends.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/personal-responsibility-democrats-republicans-jfk-schwarzenegger-and-cell-phones/</link>
	<description>A Canadian Perspective Visually and Verbally Expressed with Passion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:45:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://billarends.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/personal-responsibility-democrats-republicans-jfk-schwarzenegger-and-cell-phones/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billarends.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/personal-responsibility-democrats-republicans-jfk-schwarzenegger-and-cell-phones/#comment-622</guid>
		<description>Does the choice between personal responsibility and enforcement depend at all on whether the foolish and irresponsible are merely risking themselves, or putting other people at risk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the choice between personal responsibility and enforcement depend at all on whether the foolish and irresponsible are merely risking themselves, or putting other people at risk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 49erDweet</title>
		<link>http://billarends.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/personal-responsibility-democrats-republicans-jfk-schwarzenegger-and-cell-phones/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>49erDweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billarends.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/personal-responsibility-democrats-republicans-jfk-schwarzenegger-and-cell-phones/#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Actually, Bill, in a way I agree with &lt;i&gt;jm&lt;/i&gt;.  I have no problem ignoring an incoming call - and not initiating the other kind, too - while behind the wheel.  Particularly when embroiled in traffic.  Which is usually pretty intense in the UK.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;Otoh&lt;/i&gt;, in the wide open spaces of the west, and in light to non-existent rural freeway traffic, it sure seems like overkill to think a normal person can&#039;t hold an occasional conversation on a phone and still safely drive.  I believe statisticly, we can.  No matter what the &#039;experts&#039; opine.  But the &#039;illusion&#039; of safety is oft times more important to legislators and voters than the actuality.  So once again common sense takes a back seat to politics and perceived reality.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Bill, in a way I agree with <i>jm</i>.  I have no problem ignoring an incoming call &#8211; and not initiating the other kind, too &#8211; while behind the wheel.  Particularly when embroiled in traffic.  Which is usually pretty intense in the UK.</p>
<p><i>Otoh</i>, in the wide open spaces of the west, and in light to non-existent rural freeway traffic, it sure seems like overkill to think a normal person can&#8217;t hold an occasional conversation on a phone and still safely drive.  I believe statisticly, we can.  No matter what the &#8216;experts&#8217; opine.  But the &#8216;illusion&#8217; of safety is oft times more important to legislators and voters than the actuality.  So once again common sense takes a back seat to politics and perceived reality.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juggling Mother</title>
		<link>http://billarends.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/personal-responsibility-democrats-republicans-jfk-schwarzenegger-and-cell-phones/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Juggling Mother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billarends.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/personal-responsibility-democrats-republicans-jfk-schwarzenegger-and-cell-phones/#comment-616</guid>
		<description>In the UK holding a phone while driving is an offence.  It always did count as dangerous driving if you drove dangerously while holding a phone (or anything else for that matter - there were sucessful prosecutions for holding a can of drink, a chocolate bar, and other peoples anaotmy), but this Gov&#039;t sure likes passing new legislation &amp; so now phones have their own specific bit of the Act.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Although a lot of people still flout it, it has made a difference.  I see it like the seatbelt laws - there was uproar when they were first bought in, and everyone said they wouldn&#039;t comply, but over time, it became common practise, and is now universally  accepted.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BTW, there were a fair number of scientific studies done, many paid for by the mobile phone companies, which came back with pretty damning reports of how our brains can not hold a phone conversation (even hands free) and concentrate on the road at the same time. Something about which bits of the brain are firing for each activity, and that we visualise when talking on the phone.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As to whether it is the Gov&#039;t responsibility to legislate:  The gov&#039;t is there to protect the people.  If they are too damn stupid to stop doing something that is dangerous, then legislation is required.  I&#039;d prefer to see some education &amp; sense from the people, but.....&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The law doesn&#039;t bother me - i can spare the 5mins to pull up and hold my conversation, or - shock, horror - not answer the phone for the duration of the journey!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the UK holding a phone while driving is an offence.  It always did count as dangerous driving if you drove dangerously while holding a phone (or anything else for that matter &#8211; there were sucessful prosecutions for holding a can of drink, a chocolate bar, and other peoples anaotmy), but this Gov&#8217;t sure likes passing new legislation &#038; so now phones have their own specific bit of the Act.</p>
<p>Although a lot of people still flout it, it has made a difference.  I see it like the seatbelt laws &#8211; there was uproar when they were first bought in, and everyone said they wouldn&#8217;t comply, but over time, it became common practise, and is now universally  accepted.</p>
<p>BTW, there were a fair number of scientific studies done, many paid for by the mobile phone companies, which came back with pretty damning reports of how our brains can not hold a phone conversation (even hands free) and concentrate on the road at the same time. Something about which bits of the brain are firing for each activity, and that we visualise when talking on the phone.</p>
<p>As to whether it is the Gov&#8217;t responsibility to legislate:  The gov&#8217;t is there to protect the people.  If they are too damn stupid to stop doing something that is dangerous, then legislation is required.  I&#8217;d prefer to see some education &#038; sense from the people, but&#8230;..</p>
<p>The law doesn&#8217;t bother me &#8211; i can spare the 5mins to pull up and hold my conversation, or &#8211; shock, horror &#8211; not answer the phone for the duration of the journey!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
